Archive | April 2015

Will Rosie O’Donnell Support Michele Rounds with “Child Support”?

Department of Child Support Services, DCSS, was originally put in place to collect back child support for children who were receiving government aid. The government in essence had loaned money to help poor families who were unable to collect court ordered child support.

With matching Title IV-D funds being split between the states depending on how much child support is collected by DCSS, the child support agency workers, highly paid attorneys, are becoming more aggressive in getting their piece of the pie.

California is a wealthy state and opportunities abound to separate children from parents, then charge the non-custodial parent to have the other parent, or even grandparent, keep the kids.

If you have not been through the system, you probably think I am crazy. I have been seen by several psychiatrists, and the only diagnosis given is depressed and anxious. Depressed and anxious is not crazy.

Several parents who were estranged from their children by an apparently corrupt court have shared their case files and personal time with me. They are articulate, don’t use drugs or alcohol when around me, have advanced degrees in psychology and teaching, have been bank vice presidents and most are faithful Christians.

According to stories in gossip media, Rosie O’Donnell’s estranged wife, Michelle Rounds is claiming Rosie has a drug and alcohol problem that makes parenting impossible.

Okay, so Michelle meets this other lesbian woman who has four children already, three adopted and one by artificial insemination. She falls in love, signs a pre-nup and marries. Then she specifically goes out and adopts a fifth child.

Was Rosie abstaining from drugs and alcohol all this time? What did Michelle Rounds write on her adoption application about her spouse?

I know a wonderful woman, a devout Christian, the director of probation for a large county, who was denied adoption because she was single. The paper work is pretty stringent. So, what did Michelle Rounds write, probably under penalty of perjury, about Rosie O’Donnell?

It seems more likely to me that Ms. Rounds is a gold-digger and will use the legal system and an innocent child to get a big pay-day. The sick thing is, the judges and DCSS will be right there, hands out, ready to grab as much money as they can from one mother of this child, to give to the other mother and pay their own salaries.

Is that really in the “best interest of the child”?


Child Support should benefit the Children: Open Letter to CSSD Attorney Alexandra Bauer

Alexandra Bauer, Chief Attorney and Roye Randall

County of Los Angeles Child Support Services Department

20221 S. Hamilton Avenue, Torrance, CA 90502

April 28, 2015

Dear Counsel,

This is a proposal that will fulfil the purpose and letter of the law as concerning child support arrears allegedly owed by me. Cooperation from Roye Randall may be used as a mitigating factor in the ethical violations against her which have been reported to the California State Bar.

As Ms. Randall wrote, the underlying family law case is “tortured”.

The file for PD 016769 is missing, again. The Court in Los Angeles ordered the case to be transferred to San Diego on July 21, 2014 and again on February 5, 2015. Ms. Randall made ex parte application for a writ of execution in Los Angeles in December 2014, knowing the case was transferred to San Diego, but forum shopping. The proper procedure, as per CCP 399(a) would have been for CSSD to pay the cost of the transfer and then collect those costs, if appropriate. It was not proper to proceed in Los Angeles, and now I am forced to file another appeal.

Also, the ROA printout submitted by Ms. Randall does not have a record of the May 2008 motions for disqualification of Commissioner Alan Friedenthal for an appearance of bias. I filed two such motions on May 6 and May 16. Both were denied. I proceeded with a petition for writ of mandate, which was denied, but the record at the appellate court was not destroyed. Three years later, the Commission on Judicial Performance convinced the California Supreme Court that I was correct; there was an appearance of bias and embroilment by the judicial officer who wrote the child custody order the child support order is based on. I had zero percent of the time with my younger son, and no contact. (There was supposed to be monitored visits with the judicial officer’s neighbor, Michael Howard, but those were frustrated by Timothy Lynn and his parents.)

I have a copy of emails from Timothy Lynn’s mother to minor’s counsel Kenneth P. Sherman stating that custody was transferred to Timothy for child support purposes only, and that Branden would continue to live with James and Helen Lynn (and their convicted child abductor daughter, Crystel Strelioff).

There are witnesses, including Branden Lynn, that Branden lived with Helen and James Lynn four nights per week and with Branden’s girlfriend’s family three nights a week. Branden was not given driver’s education, and did not have his driver’s license when he came to live with me on his 18th birthday.

Child support is to benefit the children. It is not “spousal support”.  I believe the child support ordered against me was in anticipation of my receiving a future inheritance. My lifestyle was, and is, quite modest. I give most of the money available to me to my children. When my mother as trustee of a family trust gifted a portion of two properties to me, I gifted those properties to my children.

Perhaps the reason Commissioner Friedenthal appeared to be biased and embroiled in my case had to do with his lifetime friendship with my sister’s husband. When Commissioner Friedenthal made his unjust rulings, my parents were convinced by my sister to change their trust. My children were cut off from any further inheritance, supposedly to protect the money from going to Timothy Lynn. The effect was a much larger inheritance to my sister’s children, and perhaps some kind of kick-back to Commissioner Friedenthal.

It is just to ensure any child support is used for the benefit of the children, whether they are minors or adults. My suggestion is to joinder the children into PD 016769 and move the court to order all child support arrears be paid directly to Sean and Branden Lynn.

I am not an attorney, so I suggest Ms. Randall represent the children pro-bono in repentance of lying to the court in SDSC 37-2013-00041919 in an attempt to be heard ex parte on April 17, 2015. A copy of the first pages of the transcript of that hearing are attached. Ms. Randall has no disciplinary record since being evicted from her Harvard dormitory in 1976 for disorderly conduct (according to the Harvard Crimson), so we can hope this was an isolated transgression.

Even though I believe the child support orders are void, I intend to give the bulk of my inheritance to my children anyhow, so I will not need to protect my rights in court.

Timothy Lynn has now committed another fraud on the court by filing a stipulation for custody of Sean’s children and not serving Sean with a copy. Timothy Lynn and his girlfriend Meredith Zamboni were also practicing law without a license by preparing legal documents and having Sean sign them. It is likely Timothy intends to sue Sean for child support next. Perhaps CSSD can use their influence to have charges filed on Timothy Lynn, to encourage him to cease and desist from abusing the courts and his issue.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in ensuring justice,

Laura Lynn